16th of June, 2026

Wike, Ekiti, and the Politics of Loyalty

The controversy over the reported disavowal by the Minister of the FCT, Nyesom Wike, of a message supposedly supporting the PDP governorship candidate in Ekiti State has again revealed the contradictions and political double standards that define his role within the PDP.

According to a statement from Wike’s spokesman, he not only denied authorizing any message supporting Dr. Wole Oluyede but also fully distanced himself from the PDP campaign in Ekiti. More notably, he praised APC Governor Biodun Oyebanji while questioning why a PDP candidate would expect his support without first receiving the backing of former Governor Ayodele Fayose.

This statement raises a key question: when does political dissent turn into outright sabotage?

For years, Wike has claimed he remains a loyal PDP member. Yet his actions increasingly suggest otherwise. It’s hard to reconcile being a party member with publicly endorsing ruling-party governors, criticizing party leadership, and withholding support from party candidates during critical elections.

What happened in Ekiti is not an isolated case. It’s part of a pattern seen across the country. Wike’s political moves seem to prioritize personal alliances over party loyalty. By his own words, supporting a PDP candidate depends not on party loyalty but on the approval of his political allies.

Even more troubling is the idea that political legitimacy in Ekiti must come through a single individual. Parties are built on institutions, not personal friendships. A candidate chosen through the party’s official process shouldn’t need external validation from power brokers before getting support from fellow party members.

While Wike deserves criticism, Dr. Wole Oluyede is not entirely blameless.

Politics rewards consistency and loyalty. Many remember that Oluyede rose through structures and individuals who heavily invested in building the PDP in Ekiti. Instead of strengthening those relationships, there’s a perception that he drifted from longtime allies in pursuit of acceptance within the so-called “rainbow coalition” around Wike.

The lesson is simple: political structures matter.

History shows many politicians who abandoned loyal allies for seemingly stronger alliances, only to find that political convenience rarely results in real commitment. When disagreements happen, these arrangements often fall apart, leaving those who relied on them vulnerable.

The irony is hard to miss. A candidate who supposedly shifted loyalty to seek broader support now finds himself publicly rejected by the very camp he tried to join.

For the PDP, this situation is damaging. The party cannot keep allowing some of its top members to undermine its candidates while still claiming membership and influence. No serious political organization can function when its leaders are working at cross purposes.

The Ekiti episode should be a wake-up call. Political parties need to be guided by principles, discipline, and shared goals. Individuals shouldn’t be allowed to become institutions unto themselves.

As the governorship election nears, Ekiti voters will decide the outcome. One thing, however, is already clear: Wike’s statement strengthens a growing perception that he’s increasingly comfortable acting as a political stakeholder outside the PDP while still enjoying its benefits.

For Oluyede, it’s a reminder that political shortcuts often come with a high price. For the PDP, it’s yet another chapter in a crisis that continues to weaken the party internally, when unity should be its greatest strength.

~ Copied